Broad Spectrum SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen Lotion for Body
Rated 1 out of 5 by Michelle1445 from Where's the ingredients list? Has anyone else noticed that Clinique never posts their ingredients online? No one thinks that's suspicious? They say they are a sensitive skincare company, yet half of their formulas haven't changed from the 1980's. One of their primary ingredients is mineral oil, a leftover substance after producing petroleum jelly, that has been linked to cancer. And this product doesn't even have the circle around the UVA, meaning the Canadian government hasn't certified it to protect you against as much UVA rays as UVB. All I'm saying is, I'd like to see the ingredients and the research behind this stuff when I buy it. That type of information should be readily available.
Date published: 2017-05-25
Rated 5 out of 5 by CaitlynM from A natural alternative! A nice alternative to parabens and chemical sunscreens. Oil free so it doesn't cause breakouts.
Date published: 2017-04-08
Rated 2 out of 5 by sdarcelle from Not great for hot climates I bought this sunscreen for a holiday to Mexico and this formula is not great for hot climates. It is not waterproof or sweat proof - which is fine - but it tends to pill off while wearing it sunbathing. There is a strong white cast - which is common for mineral screens - but this one never tends to blend in. I can't say I would repurchase.
Date published: 2018-05-19
Rated 1 out of 5 by S123 from Ingredient list missing Find it strange the mineral spf didn't list the ingredients or percentage. Shoppers, why don't you have better brands like Maelove, Elta, or Australian Gold that are mineral and don't leave a white cast. Why is it so hard to find a good one in Canada but in the U.S not? We have so poor formulas
Date published: 2018-03-25